A striking 38.5% of candidates were flagged for possible cheating in a study of nearly 20,000 interviews. That does not necessarily mean every flagged candidate cheated, but the number captures a growing concern: employers are no longer sure whether they are interviewing a person, an AI assistant, or both.
Then came the viral Reddit headline: “The C-suite might be cheating in AI interviews more than the interns.” It challenged the assumption that covert AI use is mainly a junior-candidate problem. Executives, project managers, developers, and other experienced professionals may have even more incentive to protect their polished image when the pressure is high.
For working professionals, the issue is not whether AI belongs anywhere in the hiring process. It already does. The real question is where legitimate preparation ends and misrepresentation begins.
The short answer for working professionals
Is using AI during a job interview cheating?
The practical answer has two parts:
- Using AI before an interview to research, practice, organize your experience, and improve your communication is not cheating. It is smart preparation.
- Using an invisible AI tool to generate answers during the live interview, without the interviewer’s knowledge or permission, is usually cheating. At minimum, it creates a serious trust problem.
The dividing line is not simply whether AI was involved. It is whether the interviewer is evaluating your actual judgment, communication, and knowledge.
Think of it like project reporting. Using software to organize data, identify trends, and prepare a status report is normal. Secretly changing the numbers so the project appears healthier than it is would be misrepresentation.
AI can support your performance. It should not impersonate your competence.
Why the distinction matters
Job interviews have always involved preparation. Candidates rehearse answers, research the company, ask mentors for advice, and review common interview questions.
AI makes all of that faster.
You can paste a job description into an AI tool and ask it to identify likely interview themes. You can practice behavioral questions, improve the structure of your answers, and find weak points in your examples. None of this is fundamentally different from working with a career coach, reading an interview guide, or asking a colleague to run a mock interview.
Live AI assistance is different because the employer may believe it is observing how you think in real time.
That distinction matters in roles where judgment is part of the job. A project manager might be asked:
“A critical supplier tells you that a key component will arrive three weeks late. What do you do first?”
The interviewer is not only looking for project management vocabulary. They want to see whether you clarify the impact, examine the critical path, engage the right stakeholders, consider response options, and communicate uncertainty.
If an AI tool silently generates a polished answer while you read it from the screen, the interviewer is evaluating the tool’s reasoning instead of yours.
Part one: Using AI to prepare is recommended
Responsible AI-assisted preparation can make you a stronger candidate without compromising your integrity.
Research the role and organization
AI can help you interpret a long or unclear job description. Ask it to identify:
- The core responsibilities
- The skills that appear repeatedly
- Likely performance expectations
- Possible interview questions
- Gaps between the role and your current experience
Do not assume the tool’s interpretation is automatically correct. Verify important information against the employer’s website, the original posting, and other reliable sources.
For example, a posting may request experience with “hybrid delivery.” AI can explain that this usually means combining predictive and agile approaches. You can then prepare a real example of a project where you used a structured plan for governance while managing delivery through shorter iterations.
Build a better experience bank
Many candidates struggle in interviews because they try to remember their best examples under pressure.
Before the interview, use AI to organize an experience bank around topics such as:
- Resolving stakeholder conflict
- Recovering a delayed project
- Managing a budget issue
- Leading through uncertainty
- Handling a change request
- Communicating bad news
- Learning from a failure
You can also ask AI to help structure each story using the STAR format:
- Situation: What was happening?
- Task: What were you responsible for?
- Action: What did you personally do?
- Result: What changed because of your actions?
The key is that the story must remain true. AI can improve the structure, but it should not invent the project, inflate your authority, or create results you did not achieve.
Practice realistic follow-up questions
A good interviewer rarely stops after your first answer.
If you say you recovered a delayed project, expect questions such as:
- How did you identify the root cause?
- Which stakeholders resisted the recovery plan?
- What trade-offs did you make?
- What happened to the budget?
- What would you do differently now?
AI is useful because it can challenge vague statements. Ask it to act as a skeptical hiring manager and question your assumptions. That kind of preparation can expose weak details before the real interview.
Improve clarity without removing your voice
Working professionals often have relevant experience but explain it with too much context, jargon, or technical detail.
AI can help shorten an answer and make it easier to follow. It can also identify where your role is unclear. For example, “the team decided” may hide your actual contribution. A stronger answer might explain that you facilitated the analysis, presented three options, and obtained approval for a revised plan.
However, avoid memorizing AI-generated scripts word for word. Over-polished answers can sound unnatural, and candidates often struggle when the interviewer asks an unexpected follow-up.
Use AI to sharpen your thinking, not replace it.
Part two: Live, hidden AI creates a different risk
Tools such as Cluely and Interview Coder represent a more controversial use case. They can run in the background, listen to interview questions, and present suggested responses while the conversation is happening.
The appeal is obvious. Interviews are stressful. Even experienced professionals can forget examples, lose their train of thought, or struggle with a technical question.
But hidden assistance changes the nature of the assessment.
If the employer has not approved the tool, the candidate may be creating a false impression about:
- How quickly they can analyze a problem
- How well they communicate without a script
- What technical knowledge they personally possess
- How they behave under pressure
- Whether they can exercise independent judgment
This is not just a moral debate. It is a project and business risk.
A hiring manager could make a $50,000 bad-hire mistake after selecting someone whose interview performance cannot be reproduced on the job. That cost may include recruiting, onboarding, salary, management time, disrupted delivery, and the effort required to restart the hiring process.
The candidate also takes a major risk. If covert AI use is detected, the interview may end immediately. If it is discovered after hiring, the employee may face damaged trust, disciplinary action, or termination, depending on the employer’s policies and the claims made during the process.
Apply the transparency test
A simple way to judge an AI use case is to ask:
Would I be comfortable telling the interviewer exactly how I am using this tool?
If the answer is yes, the use is more likely to be ethical.
For example:
“I used AI to generate practice questions and organize my project examples before today’s interview.”
Most hiring managers would view that as reasonable preparation.
Now consider:
“An AI tool is listening to your questions and generating the answers I am giving you.”
Unless the employer explicitly allows that arrangement, the reaction will probably be very different.
Transparency does not resolve every issue, but it exposes the most obvious problem. When a tool must remain hidden to be useful, that is a warning sign.
A practical traffic-light guide
Because interview formats vary, it helps to think about AI use in three categories.
Green: generally appropriate
These uses usually support preparation rather than misrepresent performance:
- Analyzing the job description
- Researching likely interview topics
- Practicing behavioral or technical questions
- Improving the structure of truthful examples
- Receiving feedback on clarity and conciseness
- Preparing questions for the interviewer
- Checking your resume for alignment with the role
- Running a mock interview
Yellow: ask first
These uses may be acceptable, but expectations should be clarified:
- Using AI during a take-home assignment
- Using coding assistance in a technical assessment
- Consulting AI during an open-resource case study
- Using transcription or note-taking tools during the interview
- Using an AI accessibility tool
- Referring to AI-generated notes during a presentation
A simple question can prevent confusion:
“Are AI tools permitted for this exercise, and if so, are there any limits on how I should use them?”
Asking does not make you look unprepared. It shows that you understand governance, boundaries, and professional accountability.
Red: likely deceptive
These uses usually undermine the validity of the interview:
- Secretly generating live answers
- Reading AI output as if it were your own spontaneous response
- Using AI to solve a closed-book technical test
- Inventing experience, qualifications, or project results
- Allowing another person or system to answer on your behalf
- Concealing AI use after being directly asked about it
The common factor is not the technology. It is deception.
What if AI is part of the real job?
This is the strongest argument in favor of allowing AI during interviews.
If employees will use AI every day, why force candidates to work without it?
There is some truth to that position. A modern project manager may use AI to draft communications, summarize meeting notes, analyze risks, create first-pass plans, or explore scenarios. Employers should want to know whether candidates can use these tools effectively.
But an AI-enabled role still requires human capability.
A project manager must be able to recognize when an AI-generated schedule is unrealistic. A leader must know when a stakeholder message sounds confident but ignores a critical concern. A technical professional must be able to review generated work for errors, security issues, and unsupported assumptions.
The best hiring process may therefore test both modes:
- What can the candidate do independently?
- What can the candidate accomplish with approved AI tools?
For example, an employer could conduct a short discussion without AI, followed by a case exercise where AI use is explicitly permitted. The candidate could then explain which outputs they accepted, rejected, or revised.
That would test a more valuable skill than either memorization or covert prompting: responsible human-AI collaboration.
Lessons for hiring managers and project leaders
Candidates are not the only people who need to adapt. Employers must make their expectations clear.
If you are hiring a project professional, define the rules before the interview or assessment. State whether AI is:
- Prohibited
- Allowed for preparation only
- Allowed during specific exercises
- Allowed if disclosed
- Required as part of the evaluation
You should also design questions that are harder to fake with generic output.
Ask candidates to explain details from their own experience. Explore trade-offs, consequences, disagreements, and lessons learned. Follow up on why they selected one response instead of another.
A candidate who genuinely led a difficult project can usually describe the messy parts: the incomplete information, stakeholder politics, rejected options, and decisions that looked reasonable at the time. Generic AI output often sounds organized but lacks lived detail.
Hiring teams should also avoid treating every pause, unusual eye movement, or polished answer as proof of cheating. A flag is not a verdict. Candidates may be nervous, using accessibility tools, checking notes, or speaking in a second language.
Good governance requires evidence, consistency, and a fair opportunity to explain.
Protect your credibility as a candidate
The safest approach is to establish your own rules before the pressure of the interview.
Use AI heavily for preparation if it helps you. Practice, refine, challenge, and organize. Then close the tool and have the real conversation unless the employer has explicitly permitted live assistance.
During the interview:
- Take a moment before answering
- Ask clarifying questions
- Admit when you do not know something
- Explain how you would find the answer
- Use specific examples from your experience
- Separate what you did from what the team did
- Be honest about the results
A thoughtful, imperfect answer is often more convincing than a flawless one. Employers are not only assessing whether you know the right words. They are deciding whether they can trust you with real work, real budgets, and real stakeholders.
So, is it cheating?
Using AI to prepare for an interview is not cheating. It is increasingly part of professional preparation.
Using hidden AI to manufacture live answers is much harder to defend. If the interviewer believes they are assessing your unaided judgment, and you secretly substitute a tool’s output, you are misrepresenting what they are evaluating.
Still, employers cannot simply pretend AI does not exist. They need clearer rules and better assessments. Candidates need transparent boundaries. Both sides should focus less on catching tool use and more on testing judgment, accountability, and the ability to verify AI-generated work.
The most useful question may not be, “Did you use AI?” It may be, “Did AI help you show your real capability, or did it help you pretend to have capability you do not?”
That is where preparation ends and cheating begins.
Want to go deeper? Create a free account at hksmnow.com and get access to our free Introduction to Project Management course – no credit card, no catch.
