Cost Plus Award Fee Contract (CPAF)

A contract type in which the buyer reimburses the seller for all allowable, actual costs of the work and adds a discretionary award fee tied to performance, which serves as the seller's profit.

Key Points

  • Seller is repaid for allowable actual costs; profit is primarily the performance-based award fee.
  • The award fee is subjective, based on the buyer's evaluation against an award-fee plan, and can range from zero to a stated maximum.
  • Best for R&D or evolving scope where costs are uncertain and the buyer wants to motivate superior performance and collaboration.
  • Cost risk sits mostly with the buyer; profit risk and evaluation uncertainty sit with the seller, and administration overhead is higher.

Example

A government agency hires a vendor to develop a prototype medical device. The contractor is reimbursed for all allowable development costs. Every six months, an award-fee board rates quality, schedule discipline, innovation, and customer satisfaction. Based on those ratings, the buyer pays an additional award fee, which may be anywhere from zero up to the preapproved fee pool.

PMP Example Question

Which contract type reimburses allowable costs and provides a performance-judged award fee rather than a formula-based incentive?

  1. Cost Plus Award Fee (CPAF)
  2. Cost Plus Incentive Fee (CPIF)
  3. Fixed Price Incentive Fee (FPIF)
  4. Time and Materials (T&M)

Correct Answer: A — Cost Plus Award Fee (CPAF)

Explanation: CPAF reimburses actual costs and uses a discretionary, subjective award fee for profit. CPIF uses a formula to calculate the incentive fee, FPIF is a fixed-price contract with an incentive, and T&M pays fixed rates for time and materials.

AI Systems with Claude, for Scrum Masters and Project Managers

Most AI pilots in project management do not fail on the model. They fail because somebody pointed the thing at a decision instead of at a task. This course is built around that distinction, and around the work that follows once you get it right.

Eight teaching sections, taught against one running project from the first lecture to the last. You watch a system get built, then you build the same one against your own sprint. Nothing here is a demo that works only on the example.

You finish with five working systems and you keep them. The sprint report machine turns your board export and standup notes into the report you currently write by hand. The retro intelligence system tells you what the team keeps saying, not just what it said this time. The stakeholder comms engine drafts the update in the register the audience expects. The backlog health monitor flags the quiet decay nobody has time to check for. The risk and dependency tracker follows the chains that actually bite.

Seventy-six working files ship with it, across four sections, so every system is built against real sprint data rather than material invented for a slide. Four sprints of retrospectives, board exports, standup notes, backlog and risk data.

Explore the Course


Run the drill before the incident runs you

Design, run and prove OT drills and tabletop exercises before an incident tests your team. OT Incident Drills and Exercises includes 24 lessons and practical exercise materials, delivered through HKSM Courses for US$47 one-time. 30-day money-back guarantee when 50% or less of the course has been consumed.

Explore the Course