Focus groups
A focus group is a facilitated discussion with a small, targeted set of stakeholders to gather qualitative insights about needs, expectations, and reactions to ideas or prototypes. It helps uncover themes, validate assumptions, and reveal differences in viewpoints.
Key Points
- Small, diverse group of 6–10 participants guided by a trained facilitator.
- Generates qualitative insights through interaction and discussion, not statistical proof.
- Uses a structured discussion guide with open-ended questions and prompts.
- Sessions can be held in person or virtually with recording and note-taking.
- Outputs include themes, quotes, preliminary requirements, risks, and next steps.
- Best when you need rapid, nuanced feedback from multiple perspectives.
When to Use
- Early in a project to explore needs, problems, or opportunities.
- When you want to test concepts, mockups, or prototypes and hear reactions.
- To validate assumptions and uncover differing stakeholder viewpoints.
- When time is limited and you want richer insights than a survey can provide.
- To complement interviews or surveys with interactive group discussion.
How to Use
- Define the objective, target participant profiles, and success criteria.
- Create a discussion guide with open-ended questions, probes, and timeboxes.
- Select a neutral facilitator and a separate note-taker; plan recording if allowed.
- Recruit 6–10 participants per session; schedule multiple sessions if segments differ.
- Open with ground rules and warm-up; encourage balanced participation.
- Use prompts, visuals, or prototypes; avoid leading questions and bias.
- Capture quotes, behaviors, and nonverbal cues; summarize themes at the end for confirmation.
- Analyze notes to extract themes, requirements, risks, and priorities; share a concise summary.
Inputs Needed
- Clear problem statement, objectives, and scope for the session.
- Stakeholder list with selection criteria for participant profiles.
- Discussion guide, consent/privacy statements, and ground rules.
- Artifacts to review (e.g., mockups, process maps, prototypes).
- Logistics and tools (venue or virtual platform, recording, materials).
Outputs Produced
- Session notes, recordings, and key quotes.
- Insights and themes mapped to objectives.
- Refined or new requirements, user stories, or acceptance criteria.
- Identified risks, issues, and assumptions.
- Prioritized ideas and recommended next actions.
Example
A project team wants feedback on a new customer onboarding process. They run two 60-minute focus groups: one with frontline staff and one with recent customers. Using a discussion guide and process mockups, the facilitator elicits pain points, desired outcomes, and risk concerns. The team synthesizes themes into updated requirements, a prioritized improvement list, and a set of risks to add to the risk register.
Pitfalls
- Groupthink or dominant voices suppressing diverse input.
- Unclear objectives leading to unfocused discussion and weak outputs.
- Leading questions or facilitator bias skewing results.
- Non-representative participant mix producing narrow insights.
- Poor documentation causing loss of key quotes and themes.
- Confidentiality or privacy concerns limiting honest responses.
Related Items
- Interviews.
- Facilitated workshops.
- Brainstorming.
- Nominal Group Technique (NGT).
- Delphi method.
- Surveys and questionnaires.
- Observation (job shadowing).
- Document analysis.
- Affinity diagramming.
PMP Example Question
A project manager needs rapid, in-depth feedback on a new service concept from marketing, operations, and support within one week. Which technique is most appropriate?
- Conduct one-on-one interviews with department heads.
- Run focus groups with a cross-section of stakeholders.
- Use the Delphi method with anonymous experts.
- Send an organization-wide survey.
Correct Answer: B — Run focus groups with a cross-section of stakeholders
Explanation: Focus groups provide quick, qualitative insights through interactive discussion among targeted participants. Interviews and surveys lack group interaction; Delphi seeks expert consensus rather than user reactions.
HKSM