Communication skills
Communication skills are the abilities used to convey and understand information effectively, including listening, speaking, writing, presenting, and nonverbal awareness. They enable two-way exchange with stakeholders to align expectations, decisions, and actions.
Key Points
- Communication skills are applied across the project to share information, build understanding, and support decisions.
- Effective use involves active listening, clear and concise messaging, appropriate tone, and cultural sensitivity.
- Channel and timing are tailored to urgency, complexity, confidentiality, and stakeholder accessibility.
- Checking for understanding through questions, paraphrasing, and feedback loops reduces rework and conflict.
- Visuals, structure, and brevity improve clarity and retention for diverse audiences.
- Documenting outcomes and next steps turns conversations into traceable commitments.
Purpose of Analysis
- Determine which communication skills and channels will best achieve the desired outcome for a specific audience.
- Identify barriers such as language, culture, noise, or tooling and plan how to mitigate them.
- Set the level of detail, tone, and format needed to match stakeholder needs and decision timelines.
- Evaluate effectiveness and adjust the communications approach to improve engagement and comprehension.
Method Steps
- Identify the audience and their preferences, language, culture, roles, and accessibility needs.
- Clarify the communication objective and the decision or action you want to enable.
- Assess complexity, sensitivity, and urgency to choose suitable channel(s) and timing.
- Plan and craft the message: structure key points, use plain language, and prepare visuals or examples.
- Engage using communication skills: active listening, open-ended questions, empathy, and nonverbal awareness.
- Confirm understanding: paraphrase, summarize, and agree on decisions, owners, and due dates.
- Record and distribute outcomes (minutes, action items, decisions) to relevant stakeholders.
- Monitor feedback, response rates, and results; refine channel, cadence, or content as needed.
Inputs Needed
- Stakeholder register or map with interests, influence, and preferences.
- Communications approach or plan, including channels and cadences.
- Team charter and working agreements on responsiveness and tools.
- Organizational policies, cultural norms, and legal or compliance constraints.
- Project status data, risks and issues, and backlog or schedule information.
- Historical communications, feedback, and lessons learned.
- Tool availability and constraints (email, chat, video, collaboration platforms).
Outputs Produced
- Updated communications approach, stakeholder engagement strategies, and cadences.
- Message maps, templates, and presentation or briefing materials.
- Meeting agendas, minutes, decision logs, and action item lists.
- Feedback summaries and stakeholder sentiment insights.
- Identified risks, issues, or change requests related to communications.
- Lessons learned entries to improve future interactions.
Interpretation Tips
- If stakeholders ask repeated basic questions, the message may be unclear or not reaching the right audience.
- Low response or slow decisions can indicate channel mismatch or overload; try a different medium or summary.
- Conflicting interpretations signal a need for confirmation techniques and clearer visuals or examples.
- Heightened emotion or resistance suggests pausing to listen, acknowledge concerns, and follow up one-on-one.
- Distributed teams benefit from concise asynchronous summaries with clear calls to action.
- Executives often prefer brief, outcome-focused updates; technical teams may need deeper detail and diagrams.
Example
A project manager must inform stakeholders about a two-week schedule slip. She identifies executives and team leads as audiences, clarifies the goal (agree on recovery options), and chooses a short briefing with a one-page summary, followed by a Q&A. During the session, she uses plain language, shows a simple timeline, invites questions, and paraphrases concerns. She confirms decisions and owners, then circulates minutes and a brief FAQ. Feedback shows clarity improved, and the team aligns on the mitigation plan.
Pitfalls
- Using one-size-fits-all messages without tailoring to audience needs.
- Over-reliance on a single channel (for example, only email) when richer interaction is needed.
- Talking more than listening and failing to check for understanding.
- Excessive jargon, long messages, or cluttered visuals that obscure key points.
- Not documenting decisions and actions, leading to confusion later.
- Ignoring cultural, language, or accessibility considerations for global teams.
PMP Example Question
A stakeholder keeps misinterpreting weekly status emails, leading to rework. What should the project manager do first to improve communication effectiveness?
- Increase the length of the status email to include more detail.
- Schedule a brief call to confirm understanding and agree on a preferred channel and format.
- Escalate the issue to the sponsor for direction.
- Remove the stakeholder from the distribution list until the report is improved.
Correct Answer: B — Schedule a brief call to confirm understanding and agree on a preferred channel and format.
Explanation: Start with two-way communication to diagnose the issue, use active listening, and tailor channel and format. This addresses root causes before escalating or adding more detail.
HKSM