Friday morning arrives, and the sprint review starts in two hours. You open Jira, yesterday’s standup notes, Slack, and the previous sprint report. Then you spend the next two hours copying updates, checking story points, rewriting blockers, and fixing the format. The Gitmore 2026 practitioner guide for engineering teams contrasts […]
Read more
There is a version of AI adoption that gives a Scrum Master more work, not less. The team updates Jira, posts in chat, joins standup, and then repeats the same information inside a new AI tool. Nothing has improved. The reporting surface has simply multiplied. The practitioner recommendation reflected by […]
Read more
You are a Scrum Master with approval for one AI credential this year. Scrum.org’s new certification looks credible, relevant, and close to your daily work. The syllabus includes AI agents, sprint planning, ethics, organisational adoption, and the changing Scrum Master role. This is not a superficial introduction. But completing it […]
Read more
If your main AI habit is asking ChatGPT to draft retrospective notes, you are improving a task that may soon need little human effort. The result feels useful because you save 20 minutes. It does not change your role. In his Online Scrum Summit 2026 keynote, Dave West framed AI […]
Read more
Easy Agile’s State of Team Alignment 2026 surveyed 419 development professionals and found a stubborn gap. Sixty-nine percent of teams implement less than 60% of their retrospective action items before the next sprint. The bell curve sits near 50%. High-performing Scrum teams complete 71% of their action items. Underperforming teams […]
Read more
Dedicated Claude Code skills for Scrum Masters now sit at the top of project management marketplace rankings. MCP Market ranks a scrum-master skill first among 18 evaluated project management skills. Claudeskills.info also places scrum-master skills at the top of its project management category. That finding changes the usual assumption about […]
Read more
Scrum.org’s AI4Agile 2026 research found that 83% of agile practitioners use AI tools. Yet only 15% have received formal training in using AI within an agile context. Most are not using AI extensively. Fifty-five percent spend 10% or less of their working time with it. The problem is not resistance […]
Read more
On June 23, 2026, Scaled Agile changed the assumptions beneath SAFe. AI is no longer treated as a tool that individual teams may add to existing practices. It now sits inside the operating model. The redesign points toward smaller AI-augmented teams, shorter work cycles, and deliberately designed handoffs between people […]
Read more
The problem is not that agile teams reject AI. They already use it, often without a repeatable way to get useful results. Scrum.org’s AI4Agile 2026 report found that 83% of agile practitioners use AI tools. Yet 55% spend no more than 10% of their working time with them, and only […]
Read more
If you work in Agile, you have probably felt it already. The quiet question in the background of team meetings, retrospectives, and coffee chats: What happens to my role when AI gets better at the work I do every day? It is an understandable fear. When new tools can summarize […]
Read more